Generally speaking, using the perpetuity growth model to estimate terminal value renders a higher value. The stable-growth model assumes the business continues to operate and generate cash flow that grows at a constant rate beyond the investment period and is reinvested. The terminal value in the stable-growth model is the value of those estimated cash flows discounted back to the end of the initial investment period. The perpetuity growth model assumes that cash flow values grow at a constant rate ad infinitum. The perpetuity growth model is preferred among academics as there is a mathematical theory behind it.
Industry Trends
The perpetuity growth model assumes that the growth rate of free cash flows in the final year of the initial forecast period will continue indefinitely into the future. In discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis, neither the perpetuity growth model nor the exit multiple approach is likely to render a perfectly accurate estimate of terminal value. Which method is best for calculating terminal value depends partly on whether an investor wishes to obtain an optimistic or conservative estimate.
Excess Cash Flow Model
The forecast period is typically 3-5 years for a normal business (but can be much longer in some types of businesses, such as oil and gas or mining) because this is a reasonable amount of time to make detailed assumptions. Anything beyond that becomes a real guessing game, which is where the terminal value comes in. Factors influencing TV include economic conditions, industry trends, and company-specific attributes, all shaping the reliability of growth assumptions. Conversely, company-specific risks, such as legal issues or poor strategic decisions, could impact the ability to achieve projected growth, thereby affecting Terminal Value estimates. Industry trends, technological advancements, and shifts in consumer preferences can shape a company’s growth prospects beyond the forecasted period.
Usually, the terminal value contributes around three-quarters of the total implied valuation derived from a discounted cash flow (DCF) model. Therefore, the estimated value of a company’s free cash flows (FCFs) beyond the initial forecast must be reasonable for the implied valuation to have merit. The exit multiple approach is more common among industry professionals, as they prefer to compare the value of a business to something they can observe in the market. You will hear more talk about the perpetual growth model among academics since it has more theory behind it. Some industry practitioners will take a hybrid approach and use an average of both. The TV of a business or asset includes the value of all future cash flows, even those not part of the projection period, in an attempt to capture values that are typically difficult to predict in regular financial models.
Such analytics result in a terminal value based on operating statistics present in a proven market for similar transactions. This provides a certain level of confidence that the valuation accurately depicts how the market would value the company in reality. The terminal growth rate is the constant rate at which a company is expected to grow forever. This growth rate starts at the end of the last forecasted cash flow period in a discounted cash flow model and goes into perpetuity. Terminal value (TV) is the value of an asset, business, or project beyond the forecasted period when future cash flows can be estimated. It assumes that a business will grow at a set growth rate forever after the forecast period.
In conclusion, Terminal Value plays a vital role in determining the intrinsic value of a company. By incorporating accurate estimates of growth rates, cost of capital, and risk-free rates, you can ensure what is terminal value a more comprehensive valuation. However, it is essential to be aware of the limitations and considerations involved in calculating Terminal Value to avoid potential pitfalls.
Moving onto the other calculation method, we’ll now walk through the exit multiple approach. For purposes of simplicity, the mid-year convention is not used, so the cash flows are being discounted as if they are being received at the end of each period. The exit multiple assumption is derived from market data on the current public trading multiples of comparable companies and multiples obtained from precedent transactions of comparable targets. The long-term growth rate should theoretically be the growth rate that the company can sustain into perpetuity. Often, GDP growth or the risk-free rate can serve as proxies for the growth rate. Projected cash flows must be discounted to their present value (PV) because a dollar received today is worth more than dollar received on a later date (i.e. the fundamental “time value of money” concept).
Terminal Value also hinges on the trajectory of the specific industry in which the company operates. It addresses the challenge of valuing a company’s long-term potential when traditional projections might become unreliable. Discounting is necessary because the time value of money creates a discrepancy between the current and future values of a given sum of money.
- Terminal value (TV) is the value of an asset, business, or project beyond the forecasted period when future cash flows can be estimated.
- The exit multiple approach is more common among industry professionals, as they prefer to compare the value of a business to something they can observe in the market.
- The perpetuity growth approach is recommended to be used in conjunction with the exit multiple approach to cross-check the implied exit multiple – and vice versa, as each serves as a “sanity check” on the other.
- To determine the present value of the terminal value, one must discount its value at T0 by a factor equal to the number of years included in the initial projection period.
- The 60% FCF to EBITDA ratio assumption is extrapolated for each forecasted period.
Do you own a business?
Assume the book value of the firm’s assets is expected to be $1 billion at the time of liquidation. Further, assume that inflation is expected to be 2% and the average age of the firm’s assets will be eight years. Now that we’ve finished projecting the stage 1 FCFs, we can move on to calculating the terminal value under the growth in perpetuity approach.
The exit multiple model for calculating terminal value of a company’s cash flows estimates cash flows by using a multiple of earnings. Sometimes equity multiples, such as the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio, are used to calculate terminal value. A commonly used approach is to use multiple earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA).
In the last twelve months (LTM), EBITDA was $50mm and unlevered free cash flow was $30mm. The exit multiple method also comes with its share of criticism as its inclusion brings an element of relative valuation into intrinsic valuation. CFI is the global institution behind the financial modeling and valuation analyst FMVA® Designation. CFI is on a mission to enable anyone to be a great financial analyst and have a great career path.
Since it is not feasible to project a company’s FCF indefinitely, the standard structure used most often in practice is the two-stage DCF model. Calculating TV involves methods like the Perpetual Growth Model and the “Exit Approach,” aiming to capture elusive values beyond the forecasted horizon. The estimation of Terminal Value heavily depends on prevailing economic conditions, such as inflation rates, interest rates, and overall macroeconomic stability. Instead of attempting to wade into the unknown, analysts use financial models like Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) along with some baseline assumptions to ascertain Terminal Value.
Considering the implied multiple from our perpetuity approach calculation based on a 2.5% long-term growth rate was 8.2x, the exit multiple assumption should be around that range. Terminal value is a financial concept used in discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis and depreciation to account for the value of an asset at the end of its useful life or of a business that’s past some projection period. Most terminal value formulas project future cash flows to return the present value of a future asset like discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis. This method is based on the theory that an asset’s value equals all future cash flows derived from that asset. These cash flows must be discounted to the present value at a discount rate representing the cost of capital, such as the interest rate.
Terminal value is calculated by dividing the last cash flow forecast by the difference between the discount and terminal growth rates. The terminal value calculation estimates the company’s value after the forecast period. Neither the perpetuity growth model nor the exit multiple approach is likely to render a perfectly accurate estimate of terminal value.
